<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Are You Crowing About</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alohadaze.com/2007/04/24/what-are-you-crowing-about/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alohadaze.com/2007/04/24/what-are-you-crowing-about/</link>
	<description>Politics. Religion. Life. In My Opinion.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:01:38 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Rhodes</title>
		<link>http://www.alohadaze.com/2007/04/24/what-are-you-crowing-about/comment-page-1/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Rhodes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alohadaze.com/2007/04/24/what-are-you-crowing-about/#comment-347</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not entirely so sure. I mean, I think that Sheryl is on her own plane of reality - along with the other global warming goofballs - when it comes to the whole climate changing issue.

And maybe it is damage control. Or maybe the general consensus thinks so little of Sheryl Crow that a statement that was meant as a joke, was interepreted as a real suggestion.

When you consider what was said, it&#039;s easier to believe that it was meant as a joke in the first place, than trying to analyze or figure out how it could have been meant seriously. Occam&#039;s razor.

RLR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not entirely so sure. I mean, I think that Sheryl is on her own plane of reality &#8211; along with the other global warming goofballs &#8211; when it comes to the whole climate changing issue.</p>
<p>And maybe it is damage control. Or maybe the general consensus thinks so little of Sheryl Crow that a statement that was meant as a joke, was interepreted as a real suggestion.</p>
<p>When you consider what was said, it&#8217;s easier to believe that it was meant as a joke in the first place, than trying to analyze or figure out how it could have been meant seriously. Occam&#8217;s razor.</p>
<p>RLR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: camojack</title>
		<link>http://www.alohadaze.com/2007/04/24/what-are-you-crowing-about/comment-page-1/#comment-346</link>
		<dc:creator>camojack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alohadaze.com/2007/04/24/what-are-you-crowing-about/#comment-346</guid>
		<description>Damage control? From the sound of things, it wasn&#039;t meant as a joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damage control? From the sound of things, it wasn&#8217;t meant as a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
